1962 9" brakes - no adjustment lever

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Kid, Casey 65

Post Reply
mercuryv8
Posts: 328
Joined: November 8, 2013, 1:20 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Canada

1962 9" brakes - no adjustment lever

Post by mercuryv8 »

Is it normal that my brakes don't have the adjustment lever? Just the bottom spring holds it at the length it was installed at. It looks like this
Image
User avatar
Toyz
Posts: 4333
Joined: March 22, 2011, 6:23 pm
Location: Baja Houston Taxes
United States of America

Re: 1962 9" brakes - no adjustment lever

Post by Toyz »

Can't see that working at all without the adjuster screw. As the brakes are applied the hydraulics plus rotating inertia all work on the secondary side of the upper pin. Now, if you are referring to cable and lever SELF-adjusters; it did not have them, although they can easily be retro- fitted. Some of the early slicks used a single action cylinder; same effect, hydraulic pressure forced both shoes against the secondary side of the upper pin, aided by inertia.
Paul
The Ford Orphanage
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
slick4x4
Posts: 5723
Joined: April 19, 2008, 10:01 pm
Location: kipp kansas
United States of America

Re: 1962 9" brakes - no adjustment lever

Post by slick4x4 »

This is a good pic showing the difference of the primary & secondary shoes
Different is in pad length.... Longer pad goes towards back of vehicle...
I have seen every combination possible tearing into brakes....
Backwards ... Two primary's on one side of the truck
The secondary's on the other....
Get em right... Makes a big difference !
.
.
.
[b]'' I think what scares me the most about you guys is that I understand you '' ..... KID
'' lookin good, a little paint adds at least 100hp!'' ....... COOTER
'' well an old guy can dream cant he? ''............ICEMAN
''I would donate organs before selling my slick''........ HOOFBEAT RACER
bruceandersson
Posts: 906
Joined: August 12, 2009, 9:44 am
Location: Ohio

Re: 1962 9" brakes - no adjustment lever

Post by bruceandersson »

A lot of earlier cars/trucks did not have self adjusting brakes. They would get adjusted along with the valves and points replacement on a regular basis.
User avatar
The Big M
Posts: 1360
Joined: August 9, 2006, 3:03 pm
Location: Rocky View County, AB
Canada

Re: 1962 9" brakes - no adjustment lever

Post by The Big M »

Toyz wrote:Some of the early slicks used a single action cylinder; same effect, hydraulic pressure forced both shoes against the secondary side of the upper pin, aided by inertia.
Paul
Were the single action cylinders used on the rear as well? I haven't torn into the rear brakes on my '62 but I do know that the fronts have the single action cylinder.
User avatar
Toyz
Posts: 4333
Joined: March 22, 2011, 6:23 pm
Location: Baja Houston Taxes
United States of America

Re: 1962 9" brakes - no adjustment lever

Post by Toyz »

Yes, but I have no idea what criteria determines which vehicles got the uni-servo.
Paul
The Ford Orphanage
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
Post Reply