roller cam 5.0, 5 speed exhaust opinions please?

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Kid, Casey 65

Post Reply
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

roller cam 5.0, 5 speed exhaust opinions please?

Post by Greg D »

My first plan was Cherry Bomb header mufflers with 2 1/4" outlets, straight pipes with a turn down dump in front of the axle.
Turns out the parts store only stocks the mufflers in 2" ($24.99 each). They get enough more expensive to look at other options if I order the 2 1/4' ($64.99 each).
Stock 5.0 Mustang engine, full length headers, 600 CFM Holley on a 68 289 cast iron intake. There may be some other mild engine upgrades later too.
Is the extra 1/4" going to be worth spending more money with a basically straight pipe setup anyway?
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
R Pope
Posts: 517
Joined: September 18, 2007, 7:53 pm
Location: sask

Post by R Pope »

2 1/4 duals are lots for a 302.
User avatar
charliemccraney
Posts: 1743
Joined: July 9, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: Lawrenceville, GA

Post by charliemccraney »

It just depends what you're going to do in the future because the pipes can be too small. My butt dyno indicates so far that larger pipes don't hurt anything except maybe your ears and some friends have backed this up with their own drag strip performance experiences, but still no official dyno tests.
For what it's worth, many aftermarket exhaust systems are 2.25 or 2.50 inch for 302 equipped vehicles.
Last edited by charliemccraney on March 27, 2011, 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lawrenceville, Ga
1961 F100 Unibody
318 Y-block (292 +.070 bore, +.170 stroke), FMS T5-Z w/Mustang 10.5" diaphragm clutch.
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Post by Greg D »

Looks like I can put together a larger size setup like I want pretty reasonable by using Summit glasspacks. I'll have to weld the collector reducer on myself but that isn't and issue.
Part of my reason for wanting this setup is the exhaust system will be a straight shot back from the collectors to the turndowns. Each side will be welded together as one piece, turndowns will be just past the stock frame hangers.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
trueblue0409
Posts: 65
Joined: March 12, 2011, 9:28 pm
Location: Phenix City, AL

Post by trueblue0409 »

well either way it will sound going but the larger size will help out on hp in the long run with future up grades
Motocentro
Posts: 145
Joined: November 7, 2007, 9:05 pm
Location: Atlanta

Post by Motocentro »

I have a similar setup - i think 2" is too small. I have 2 1/2" and it's great. Great torque, good sound. IIRC smaller can move your torque curve down but I'm not sure that you can really tell so much with your setup. Bigger pipes can also reduce resonance. I think 2 1/4" would be fine. bigger than 2 1/2" on a 302 might be too big (lose torque, etc).
My new signature.
Post Reply