backfire problems 302

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Kid, Casey 65

sully5
Posts: 307
Joined: January 17, 2011, 7:06 pm

Post by sully5 »

Not a carb problem from what I see. *Maybe* an ignition problem, I would look for severe timing issues or out of firing order. Most likely a valve train problem.

If it was me, first thing I would look for is a flat cam lobe or a valve hung open by improper lash/preload.
If thou bleedest not, thou workest not. - Hezekiah 2:12
thcrays
Posts: 12
Joined: April 7, 2011, 8:28 pm
Location: Akron

Post by thcrays »

Just a couple of more things to check without having to throw money at it in parts. Check the mechanical advance in the distributor. It is pretty simple to do. Just pop the distributor cap off and turn the rotor with your fingers, It should rotate or advance and snap back to the starting location without much effort. I have seen these get frozen or stick at times. You can also test the vacuum advance as well and see if it is working properly.

I know that it sounds pretty basic, but sometimes it is the simpliest things that kick our butts. :D
1964 F100 SWB
2008 Mustang GT
1962 Chevy Belair 2dr Post
R Pope
Posts: 517
Joined: September 18, 2007, 7:53 pm
Location: sask

Post by R Pope »

Well. at least nobody's telling you that the cam is half a turn out! Haha.
User avatar
Anthony
Posts: 1421
Joined: July 12, 2010, 4:56 am
Location: Huntington, West Virginia
United States of America

Post by Anthony »

we were on the right track... sort of.... I guess we kept fighting ourselves.... we were 180 out on the dizzy and the motor does "NOT" have the high output cam so we had plug wires wrong... :dontknow: :oops: ... anyway, his car is up and running and sounds great!!!! as soon as he finishes cleaning up the mess from this his Mom will let him bring the uni to the top of the hill..... Also, I don't think the motor he got for the uni is a Cleveland, but a modified... is it worth the $300 or should he wait on something else???

Thanks for all the input and the help guys... I am not a mechanic and I was lost on this.... :wink:
Image
User avatar
62galxe
Posts: 1567
Joined: June 8, 2007, 4:38 pm
Location: Magnolia,Texas

Post by 62galxe »

If its a C the deck should be right at the timing cover. The M should be elevated about 1 inch. The C will have small block 351W/302 motor mount bosses on the sides. The C use a small block bell housing pattern. The M uses big block bellhousing 429/460 pattern. I think I have this right but im having problems with CRS.
1963 uni PATINA BLUE
1965 short bed
User avatar
banjopicker66
Posts: 1488
Joined: July 17, 2006, 1:59 pm
Location: Middlesboro, KY

Post by banjopicker66 »

Excellent! Great detective work, too.

I have always understood that the external difference between the 351C and the 351M/400 is the bellhousing. The 351C has the Windsor bellhousing, as fits the 289, 302, 351W - and 300-6. The 351M/400 have the same bellhousing as the 385 engines, the 429 and 460.

Internally, the 351M and 400 are stronger.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_351_M

"The main difference between 351C/351M/400 engines is connecting rod length and main bearing size. The 351M/400 engines have the largest bearing size and the tallest deck height while sharing the 429/460 bell housing pattern. The 351C engine has a medium main bearing size (2.75") and shorter connecting rods (5.78") than the 351W (5.94") and the 351M/400 (6.58") while retaining the SBF (289-302w) engine mount locations and bell housing pattern. "
R Pope
Posts: 517
Joined: September 18, 2007, 7:53 pm
Location: sask

Post by R Pope »

Y'see, there's the problem with diagnosing over the Net! You say it idles well with a slight miss, but the wrong firing order, 180 degrees out or not, will run on four cylinders and pop back on speed-up. Changing the wires 180 degrees while keeping the wrong firing order will still run on 4, just the other four!
I would think there's a big diff between a "slight miss" and running on 4.
Oh, well, it's running now, anyway. Now get to work on that Slick!
Oh, and by the way, the 351M and 400 are Ford's biggest dogs! Find a 351W. The C is a good engine in a light car, but too "peaky" for a truck, and horribly expensive to build.
User avatar
Anthony's Son
Posts: 64
Joined: July 19, 2011, 8:36 pm
Location: Huntington,WV

Post by Anthony's Son »

kool then, the mustang runs great.. It will sink you in the seat every time you grab a gear... can't wait for the slick to do the same!!.. I'm going to get a C6 to go behind the 351m for and extra 75$.. so i feel I'm doing pretty good.. hopefully have it running by SS.. probably trailered but running :steering:
but you know how money goes with a teenager... see-saw.gif
Zak
1963 uni short bed
sub framed tubbed
351W carbed and C6 are the plans now..

1963 Short bed Flareside
302 3 speed
Daily Driver
Post Reply