Trans to engine spacer plate

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Post Reply
User avatar
ethan_lanning
Posts: 134
Joined: March 5, 2007, 6:31 pm
Location: Saint Joseph missouri

Trans to engine spacer plate

Post by ethan_lanning »

So about 3 hours ago I installed my new c4 tranny into my 65...the motor is a 351w...anyways after I installed the tranny I realized that I forgot to install the big metal plate that goes between the flywheel and the motor..from what I have read it is called the motor to trans spacer plate??my question is does it actually serve a purpose other than acting as a dust cover or do I need to pull the tranny and install the plate?


Thanks
Never poke another mans rust bubble.
http://www.supermotors.net/vehicles/reg ... 6959/57442
Obsa
Posts: 1928
Joined: July 19, 2006, 4:33 pm
Location: Northwest Georgia
United States of America

Post by Obsa »

If Ford put it there, you should put it back
As my dad used to say, somewhere there was a horse that died a painful death from terminal constipation due to missing a key part of its anatomy.
slick4x4
Posts: 5725
Joined: April 19, 2008, 10:01 pm
Location: kipp kansas
United States of America

Post by slick4x4 »

i did that & ran it that way..... until it quit working :oops:


put it in there :roll:
.
.
.
'' I think what scares me the most about you guys is that I understand you '' ..... KID
'' lookin good, a little paint adds at least 100hp!'' ....... COOTER
'' well an old guy can dream cant he? ''............ICEMAN
''I would donate organs before selling my slick''........ HOOFBEAT RACER
R Pope
Posts: 517
Joined: September 18, 2007, 7:53 pm
Location: sask

Post by R Pope »

That plate has a centering hole that holds the starter in the right place. The bolt holes won't do it, they are a tad loose. Put the plate in!
User avatar
Hawkrod
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 21, 2006, 10:57 pm
Location: Apple Valley CA
United States of America

Post by Hawkrod »

The vehicle can be run without the plate but due to tolerance stack it can often kill an engine or trans. In about 1962 Ford started phasing the plates into the assembly process. When a plate is used the bellhousing is thinner by the thickness of the plate and if the assembly tolerance is tight then the trans will destroy the thrust bearing on the crank and/or the front pump of the trans. It may be fine but when everything is hot and the convertor balloons it may not be fine at all. The starter is not really a major concern but it is used to index the starter exactly right but you can get the same location just being carefull when assembling (remember a 62 Ford 390 did not have the plate and a 63 did and they used the same starter and flywheel!). The thickness of the plate may not seem like much but the overall assembly tolerance is not much either. Hawkrod
User avatar
ethan_lanning
Posts: 134
Joined: March 5, 2007, 6:31 pm
Location: Saint Joseph missouri

Post by ethan_lanning »

Thanks guys..I'm going go ahead and put the plate on
Never poke another mans rust bubble.
http://www.supermotors.net/vehicles/reg ... 6959/57442
Post Reply