Anybody with a stakebed slick?
-
fire truck
- Posts: 2141
- Joined: January 17, 2010, 9:06 pm
- Location: Down in Mississippi and up to no good

-
fire truck
- Posts: 2141
- Joined: January 17, 2010, 9:06 pm
- Location: Down in Mississippi and up to no good

292
[quote="azjake"]I just bought this yesterday. It is a 1961 F350 with a freshly overhauled 2bbl V-8 (332?), 4 speed tranny and it's original Ford dump bed that works! Someone down the line installed a radiator from a Toyota. That HAS to go!!!
Included were wood sides that drop into the bed pockets, so does it qualify as a stake bed???
It does have some rust issues, but for what I got it for, I can live with it. Also, the 390 air filter is not original! But, I guess you-all knew that!
Jake
Yes that's a stake bed. Does it have FORD stamped in the back.
That engine is a 292 not a 332.
Included were wood sides that drop into the bed pockets, so does it qualify as a stake bed???
It does have some rust issues, but for what I got it for, I can live with it. Also, the 390 air filter is not original! But, I guess you-all knew that!
Jake
Yes that's a stake bed. Does it have FORD stamped in the back.
That engine is a 292 not a 332.
Yes, the bed has "Ford" stamped on the back. According to O'Reilley's website, in 1961 the F350 was available with the 223 six, 262 six, 292 w/4bbl carb and the 332 w/2bbl carb. Since the engine in my F350 has a 2bbl , I thought that it would be a 332. Are the blocks the same so the intake and carbs are able to being changed? Or, is O'Reilley's info incorrect?
Jake
Jake
I think I'll go to the "Spousal Avoidance Center" (workshop) for a while...
Re: 292
bluebolt wrote:azjake wrote:I just bought this yesterday. It is a 1961 F350 with a freshly overhauled 2bbl V-8 (332?), 4 speed tranny and it's original Ford dump bed that works! Someone down the line installed a radiator from a Toyota. That HAS to go!!!
Included were wood sides that drop into the bed pockets, so does it qualify as a stake bed???
It does have some rust issues, but for what I got it for, I can live with it. Also, the 390 air filter is not original! But, I guess you-all knew that!
Jake
Yes that's a stake bed. Does it have FORD stamped in the back.
That engine is a 292 not a 332.
OK. so after searching the net for info, it seems that the 332 was a big block and the 292 a small block. Is this correct?
Jake
I think I'll go to the "Spousal Avoidance Center" (workshop) for a while...
- 66fordtrucknut
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:48 pm
- Location: Eastern Shore - MD
I'm definitely not an engine guy but wasn't a 332 a FE motor and a 292 a Y block. Pretty sure I've seen a few in late 50's cars. Some one more qualified will chime in shortly. BTW really cool truck too!
Charlie
Charlie
62' SWB uni 223
66' F-100 Short/wide 352
78' F-350 dually dumpbed 400
12' F-150 5.0 3:73 LS
66' F-100 Short/wide 352
78' F-350 dually dumpbed 400
12' F-150 5.0 3:73 LS
I am learning more everyday about the old F350s. Some parts are not nearly as easy to find as they are for F100s. Like the driveline parts, parking brake parts, etc.
Thanks, Charlie. That is what I believe, also.
Here is a webpage with a neat ad for the 1961 F350.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/autohistorian/4110650115/
Jake
Thanks, Charlie. That is what I believe, also.
Here is a webpage with a neat ad for the 1961 F350.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/autohistorian/4110650115/
Jake
I think I'll go to the "Spousal Avoidance Center" (workshop) for a while...
- 66fordtrucknut
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:48 pm
- Location: Eastern Shore - MD
Guys on another thread I have here about the split rims are telling me that some of the junk yards may have solid six lug wheels from trucks that will work. I will start hitting the yards. That is always dangerous. Too many neat things to look at...66fordtrucknut wrote:I bet 6 lug spindles are hard to find, as are rims I guess. Good luck with it.
Charlie
I think I'll go to the "Spousal Avoidance Center" (workshop) for a while...
- 66fordtrucknut
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:48 pm
- Location: Eastern Shore - MD
-
Gittinwidit
- Posts: 9
- Joined: August 7, 2011, 11:10 am
- Location: Durham, NC
Re: Anybody with a stakebed slick?
Hate to pull up old thread but this one still baffling to me.
Saw this stake bed currently on ebay and it's exactly like a '66 F-250 I picked up early this year... Except mine has diamond plate metal flooring? I really believe now that these were produced from factory and not dealer.
Notice the "FORD" lettering on the rear of bed in the 3'rd picture. And now the odds of 2 exactly alike on the same model? And miles apart... The bolts on mine have same amount of rust as rest of frame but there's no way to prove it...
I never got a good look at the bed that came off the '62 I had. Dude kept it when I bought it. I got the tail lights which match these. And the '66 I got has the sorta "Interstate Sign" shape to them that were an option. But all 3 were single wheel rear F-250's. The wheel base of my '66 and the '62 I had is same as long bed (mentioned above).
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ford-F-2 ... 24&vxp=mtr
I'd cut and paste the picture but can't figure out how?
Or if I'm even able to?
Saw this stake bed currently on ebay and it's exactly like a '66 F-250 I picked up early this year... Except mine has diamond plate metal flooring? I really believe now that these were produced from factory and not dealer.
I never got a good look at the bed that came off the '62 I had. Dude kept it when I bought it. I got the tail lights which match these. And the '66 I got has the sorta "Interstate Sign" shape to them that were an option. But all 3 were single wheel rear F-250's. The wheel base of my '66 and the '62 I had is same as long bed (mentioned above).
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ford-F-2 ... 24&vxp=mtr
I'd cut and paste the picture but can't figure out how?
Re: Anybody with a stakebed slick?
They are listed in the parts manuals with the Ford script at rear center.
Paul
Paul
The Ford Orphanage
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
Re: Anybody with a stakebed slick?
Page 16 FORD TRUCK ENTHUSIAST (RARE OPTION FORUM) Stakebed Pictures from several different parts catalogs & different years
Be careful there's a bad Basset hound over there!
Be careful there's a bad Basset hound over there!
If you can't run with the big dogs "STAY UNDER THE PORCH" !!!!!
-
deadheadno1
- Posts: 164
- Joined: February 27, 2009, 12:38 pm
- Location: OKC
Re: Anybody with a stakebed slick?
Last edited by deadheadno1 on October 3, 2013, 8:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Make him a "deal" deal, maybe the guy's a republican!"
-
deadheadno1
- Posts: 164
- Joined: February 27, 2009, 12:38 pm
- Location: OKC
-
deadheadno1
- Posts: 164
- Joined: February 27, 2009, 12:38 pm
- Location: OKC
Re: Anybody with a stakebed slick?
AZJAKE, the engine shown in the pix of your tonner is not an FE, it's a Y block and if original would be a 292, the only Y still being produced by '61.
I am not an expert on this but it has been my understanding that the only V-8 you could get from '61 to '64 in the light duty trucks was the Y block.
Tom
I am not an expert on this but it has been my understanding that the only V-8 you could get from '61 to '64 in the light duty trucks was the Y block.
Tom
"Make him a "deal" deal, maybe the guy's a republican!"
Re: Anybody with a stakebed slick?
azjake wrote:bluebolt wrote:azjake wrote:I just bought this yesterday. It is a 1961 F350 with a freshly overhauled 2bbl V-8 (332?), 4 speed tranny and it's original Ford dump bed that works! Someone down the line installed a radiator from a Toyota. That HAS to go!!!
Included were wood sides that drop into the bed pockets, so does it qualify as a stake bed???
It does have some rust issues, but for what I got it for, I can live with it. Also, the 390 air filter is not original! But, I guess you-all knew that!
Jake
Yes that's a stake bed. Does it have FORD stamped in the back.
That engine is a 292 not a 332.
OK. so after searching the net for info, it seems that the 332 was a big block and the 292 a small block. Is this correct?
Yes , that is correct. However it is NOT an FE in '61. It is a Lincoln/ big truck Y-block not originally available in one-tons. The 332 fe was a late 50's passenger car engine.
Yours does appear to be a 292, my '63 350 has a 2 bbl 292.
Paul
Last edited by Toyz on October 3, 2013, 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Ford Orphanage
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
- F7BIGJOB
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: March 14, 2010, 7:59 am
- Location: West Greenwich, Rhode Island & Providence Plantations

Re: Anybody with a stakebed slick?
Could not find exactly what I was looking for, this copied out of James Wagners Ford book, notice the 120" wb and doesn't seem to mention 2WD's, looking at the top left caption, I tried to crop but I crapped out.

Just found this in 1965-66 Ford F100 & F 250 facts manual[ there was the same type wording for 100's using 6 1/2 foot platform or stake bodies


Just found this in 1965-66 Ford F100 & F 250 facts manual[ there was the same type wording for 100's using 6 1/2 foot platform or stake bodies

F7BIGJOB
-Steve
1965 F-250 4x4 Flareside


-Steve
1965 F-250 4x4 Flareside


- Paul Merrell
- Posts: 377
- Joined: July 17, 2006, 7:06 pm
- Location: Wilson N.C.
Re: Anybody with a stakebed slick?
When I worked at the Kenworth dealer in Durham I had to put a stake bed on an Isuzu truck. On the rear of the bed in the center of the oval is was Ford in cursive. I had never seen that before or since.
"Never underestimate the power of your actions. With one small gesture you can change a person's life - For better...or for worse." 1965 F250 4wheeldrive 390/4speed/dana 60 rear 3.73/dana 44/PB
