how to tell 351s apart?

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Kid, Casey 65

User avatar
ripsnorter
Posts: 607
Joined: November 12, 2006, 5:23 am
Location: Washington State

how to tell 351s apart?

Post by ripsnorter »

how do you tell the 351s apart? is there some way to tell them apart by looking at them? or do you have to look at the codestamp on the engine? and how do break down the serial on the engine?

I'm looking at grabbing a 65ish F250 that has a V8 in it, the guy thinks its a 351 but he's not sure. I dont completely trust the stamp on the body, as I dont know if the engine has been swapped or not.

and what was that link someone gave me a while back that broke down the various codes for engine, transmission etc you find on the door tag?

thats a lot of questions aint it? :shock:
MadMaxetc
Posts: 2600
Joined: July 10, 2006, 12:00 pm
Location: Wichita, KS
Contact:
United States of America

Post by MadMaxetc »

Our Buddies over at www.FORDification.com have all the info...

http://www.fordification.com/engineID.htm

check it out!

(Nice job Keith!)
Dan
Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4
My Build Thread
User avatar
6166 Junkyard Dog
Posts: 3502
Joined: July 23, 2006, 9:34 am
Location: Reidsville, N.C.
Contact:
United States of America

Post by 6166 Junkyard Dog »

MAN SO EASY Are we talking about 302 to 351W 302 has reg headbolts, 351W has the head bolts with washers built on the headbolt early 351 c is like 302/351W takes the same trans as them narrow top bolt pattern on trans. late 351C has the wide pattern at the top like your 351M/400 429/460 trans...
Tom,
@
Lazy FORD Ranch
Where Ford Trucks Rest in Peace

Dakota,,, RIP will never be the same looking for 61-66 trucks again ,, :cry: Kathy :cry:
Slickstock,,, York, PA
Slickstock,,, Kansas City, MO
Slickstock,,, Altoona, IOWA
Slickstock,,, Salina, KS

Now Cooper will try his best :lol: :lol:

12649

Cooper now has 2018 Slick Stock,, give him a fair star :lol:
Slickstock Kansas City, Mo
User avatar
bigtrip460
Posts: 305
Joined: February 4, 2007, 7:34 pm
Location: OHIO!
Contact:

Post by bigtrip460 »

351w has the thermostat housing that mounts on the front of the intake
User avatar
ripsnorter
Posts: 607
Joined: November 12, 2006, 5:23 am
Location: Washington State

Post by ripsnorter »

thanks a lot guys, big help.

would they have used any 351Cs in 64-66? or just Ws? and are the Cs still sought after good engines?

I may buy this truck just to play around with the engine etc, and I'd kind of like to make sure beforehand that its even worth playing with.

---- Edit -----

errr, nevermind. after researching, i guess they didnt even start making 351Ws til 69. heh. :oops:

is there any possibility that whatever engine is in that thing would be worth screwing with?
User avatar
jakdad
Posts: 1968
Joined: July 18, 2006, 4:07 pm
Location: Katy,Texas

Post by jakdad »

I wouldn't spend a lot of money on a 351M. The 400s can be made to run but none of the 351M-400 series will get good gas milage.
Jim
User avatar
mikecarson
Posts: 596
Joined: July 9, 2006, 5:59 am
Location: Richland, Texas
Contact:

Post by mikecarson »

Probably a 352.
Mike C
64 CC, Crown Vic project
62 CC
67short 94 F150, 433W
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive body, but to skid in sideways - body worn out and screaming: Woo Hoo, what a ride!"
User avatar
66fordtrucknut
Posts: 1289
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:48 pm
Location: Eastern Shore - MD

Post by 66fordtrucknut »

Take a pic.
Charlie
62' SWB uni 223
66' F-100 Short/wide 352
78' F-350 dually dumpbed 400
12' F-150 5.0 3:73 LS
BigTim
Posts: 890
Joined: August 6, 2006, 4:26 pm
Location: Slickless

Post by BigTim »

mikecarson wrote:Probably a 352.


Kind of what I was thinking, does it look like an FE?

jakdad wrote:I wouldn't spend a lot of money on a 351M.


Like tortoise they are slow and steady. But the best thing about them is they are removable. :lol:
ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

BigTim wrote:
mikecarson wrote:Probably a 352.


Kind of what I was thinking, does it look like an FE?

jakdad wrote:I wouldn't spend a lot of money on a 351M.


Like tortoise they are slow and steady. But the best thing about them is they are removable. :lol:


lots of people are confused between 351 and 352.seen lots of 352s that were advertised as 351C, even argued with one who said there was no such thing as a 352.
most likely its a 352.

the best thing about the 351M/400 besides its use as a boat anchor is the fact that once you drop it in the water at the end of a chain you can install a real engine, 429 or 460 in its place.
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
User avatar
Slick Fan
Posts: 4085
Joined: November 4, 2006, 5:09 pm
Location: UTAH...snow blows!

Post by Slick Fan »

ICEMAN6166 wrote:
lots of people are confused between 351 and 352.seen lots of 352s that were advertised as 351C, even argued with one who said there was no such thing as a 352.

I had that happen once...the guy thought it was a 351C & even started swearing at me. :shock: Then I took a rag & wiped off the block, exposing the '352' cast into it...'there, do ya believe me now?" :evil:
The guy was uhhh... :oops:

So because it wasn't an almighty Cleveland anymore & was just a lowly 352, I got the engine for $50, instead of the $400 he was asking. I would have paid more, if he hadn't gotten belligerent with me...so I get it home & checked it out closer, it ended up being a 390. SWEET! :D :rotflmao:

Trying to tell someone their 400 really isn't a 351C is a real joy too, sometimes. :roll:
My "Slickitis" affliction began here...
Image


66 F100 CC/65 F100 CC/66 F250 CC
If it starts to rain, they'll tax the splash.
If you want to fish, they'll tax the bass.
If you plant a yard, they'll tax the grass.
If you don't play nice, they'll fine your *$#!
User avatar
bigtrip460
Posts: 305
Joined: February 4, 2007, 7:34 pm
Location: OHIO!
Contact:

Post by bigtrip460 »

I like it when people that should know SWEAR a cleveland is a bigblock. :roll: some guys will fight to the death over that.
User avatar
Johnny Canuck
Posts: 8288
Joined: April 9, 2006, 11:14 pm
Location: Edmonton, Alberta.
Canada

Post by Johnny Canuck »

The world is full of experts.

One of the parts houses here, one that hires real Partsmen, that have been there for years, argued with a friend of mine that there was no such thing as a 352.
Until my friend made him look it up. The color of his face, apparently , was good enough for fire engine use.. :rotflmao:
It's a race.. Will hell freeze over or will JC finish his truck first. Stay tuned..
Satinblack
Posts: 49
Joined: November 24, 2006, 12:09 pm
Location: California

Post by Satinblack »

Some folks just have no clue. 351C wasnt even built when slicks were out.
User avatar
jakdad
Posts: 1968
Joined: July 18, 2006, 4:07 pm
Location: Katy,Texas

Post by jakdad »

There isn't much telling what engine is in a truck over 15 years of age.
Jim
Fordman
Posts: 318
Joined: February 14, 2007, 7:13 pm
Location: Ottawa Kansas

Post by Fordman »

which of the 351 are the best and or hottest engines.
User avatar
Uncle Skip
Posts: 4695
Joined: July 15, 2006, 8:30 pm
Location: Pearland, Texas
United States of America

Post by Uncle Skip »

If the motor is an FE (352-390-406-410-427-428) the intake manifold looks like its part of the cylinder head. That is, the head is not a unitized one piece like a regular motor. The pushrods go thru the intake and the valve cover covers part of the intake as well as the head.
Its the only one out there like that so its easy to tell.
Besides, its a big wide mother dunker and the others are relatively narrow from valve cover to valve cover. 8)
U@ss
I'm not arguing with you. I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Pardon me. Does your deaug bite?
BigTim
Posts: 890
Joined: August 6, 2006, 4:26 pm
Location: Slickless

Post by BigTim »

Fordman wrote:which of the 351 are the best and or hottest engines.


Back in the 70s and 80s the Cleveland was the big power maker, 2V, 4V, and Aussie heads, a lot of peoplke even put those heads on their Windsors.

But now with all the tech that has gone into Windsor heads, Dart blocks, that the 5.0 craze set off, Windsor is the only way to go in my opinion.
User avatar
bigtrip460
Posts: 305
Joined: February 4, 2007, 7:34 pm
Location: OHIO!
Contact:

Post by bigtrip460 »

I agree, cleveland was OK (some will fight to the death over that statement as well) but it didnt stand the test of time. there is a reason for that.

the windsor is a better overall design (though the thermostat housing location was poorly thought out :roll:) people talk about cleveland heads being so much better, but why do that when you can get bolt on aftermarket heads that flow just as good or even better?


I think cleveland's are over rated and the myth has out grown reality.
didgeytrucker
Posts: 142
Joined: July 23, 2006, 4:07 pm

Post by didgeytrucker »

Ever since the mid 70's when NASCAR set a 358 cid limit, the Ford motors have run a Cleveland style head. The current Ford NASCAR motor is a hybrid using a 351W style block with 351C style heads. The street nickname for this is a "Clevor" and there have been intakes cast to do this at home.

Today you want the most bang for your buck (and horsepower per pound). The aftermarket support for the 351W says that's the way to go today.... unless you just have to have an FE 352 (which looks just like a 390, 428 and 427 on the outside) or a 351C just to say you have one. Tie the 351M/400 to a chain to keep your boat in place.

When I bought 66KIXX it had a 351C 2V in it. It still does.

Tracy
1956 F-100 Panel w/429 (3.50 9")
1966 F-100 SWB w/351C (3.25 9" - 3.70 posi for Saturday nights)
Music City F-100's,
1965 GT-350 S/C (2.78 1st & 3.70 TracLok 9")
Music City Mustang Club
1969 Schwinn StingRay
Don't focus on the destination....make the JOURNEY the adventure
Post Reply