2 OR 4?

bawrencher · Post by **bawrencher** » February 21, 2007, 2:17 pm

Is it just me or not that thinks quad headlight trucks look wrong. .

Johnny Canuck · Post by **Johnny Canuck** » February 21, 2007, 2:41 pm

ICEMAN6166 · Post by **ICEMAN6166** » February 21, 2007, 3:09 pm

far as i know just you two. :rotflmao:

wheres Tim, im probably going to need reinforcements on this. :help:

Johnny Canuck · Post by **Johnny Canuck** » February 21, 2007, 3:41 pm

Notice the resemblance??

Max · Post by **Max** » February 21, 2007, 4:08 pm

The signature Ford F-100 Edith Bunker. Predecessor to the Eddie Baur.

66fordtrucknut · Post by **66fordtrucknut** » February 22, 2007, 6:20 am

make it 3.
Charlie

Post by **Greg D** » February 22, 2007, 10:09 am

I'll admit I do like 2 headlights better, even with 4 eyes fridges still are cool. I like the Eddie Bauer package on the mid 90s F150s the not "overdone" 2 tone on them looks good.

ELpolacko · Post by **ELpolacko** » February 22, 2007, 10:21 am

bawrencher wrote:Is it just me or not that thinks quad headlight trucks look wrong. .

It's just you guys

Fordman · Post by **Fordman** » February 22, 2007, 10:59 am

another vote against having 4.

The Big M · Post by **The Big M** » February 22, 2007, 11:39 am

ELpolacko's truck sure looks right to me. Comet's is going to look great too...

I don't see why quad headlights are acceptable on a car but not a truck.

Johnny Canuck · Post by **Johnny Canuck** » February 22, 2007, 12:21 pm

The Big M wrote:I don't see why quad headlights are acceptable on a car but not a truck.

Mean like this?

reminds me of this

ICEMAN6166 · Post by **ICEMAN6166** » February 22, 2007, 12:34 pm

stacked duals make you feel any better?
i would take them either way.
even on the edsel. i almost bought one a few years ago.

first car i ever drove was one of these.

f100fordguy · Post by **f100fordguy** » February 22, 2007, 12:35 pm

Im with brian on this one, 4 is the only way to go, cant beet 4 headlights shinning in someones eyes when they cut you off.

donno what you guys are thinking, although now that i think about it the 57's were pretty nice looking too :oops:

LOL

Tim - my votes for 4 eyes

Johnny Canuck · Post by **Johnny Canuck** » February 22, 2007, 1:06 pm

I too like Edsels, they are like that ugly dog you just can help but like. Guess I should have used this

as the bad example

ICEMAN6166 · Post by **ICEMAN6166** » February 22, 2007, 1:11 pm

that buick is an angry looking car.
still better looking than any of todays new cars.

Johnny Canuck · Post by **Johnny Canuck** » February 22, 2007, 1:18 pm

ICEMAN6166 wrote:still better looking than any of todays new cars.

Nope.

The proposed '08 Bullitt.

I want one so bad you can hear me drooling from there.

Slick Fan · Post by **Slick Fan** » February 22, 2007, 2:18 pm

Johnny Canuck wrote:
I want one so bad you can hear me drooling from there.

I wondered what that dripping sound was...I thought I left the faucet on again.

Fordman · Post by **Fordman** » February 22, 2007, 3:01 pm

some cars look ok with four headlights. but trucks look ugly with four headlights. at least the old one do.

Slick Fan · Post by **Slick Fan** » February 22, 2007, 3:16 pm

Fordman wrote:some cars look ok with four headlights.

And some cars look good with NO headlights. :mrgreen:

The Big M · Post by **The Big M** » February 22, 2007, 3:58 pm

I think "ugly" has more to do with the overall lines and flow of a vehicle, not the number of headlights. If anything, the Edsel would look more odd with single headlights. Same goes for the Buick.

How many trucks had quad headlights from the factory anyway? Apart from 58-60 Fords, of course. 80's GMC's? What else? I'm curious as to which particular model set off this little rant... :lol:

2 OR 4?

2 OR 4?

Re: 2 OR 4?