help with c6 or c4 transmission

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Kid, Casey 65

Post Reply
jbolivar
Posts: 54
Joined: March 13, 2007, 4:41 pm
Location: Eugene, Oregon

help with c6 or c4 transmission

Post by jbolivar »

Hello,

I've recently purchased a 64 f100 with a 70 mustang 302. I have access to a c4 and small bell housing c6 and wonder if anyone would tell me what they think would be best. The motor has been balanced with an rv cam and it has a 9 inch rear end with 373 gears.

Thanks, Jim
User avatar
ABA
Posts: 1770
Joined: September 23, 2006, 4:59 pm
Location: South Carolina

Post by ABA »

Well since you have a C6 available, I would go with it.
'01 F150 Lightning
490RWHP
Gas Mileage? What's that?
Jerry
User avatar
lincolnslick
Posts: 59
Joined: March 13, 2007, 2:13 pm
Location: victory mills new york

Post by lincolnslick »

ditto way stronger than the c4 8)
nothing like the smell of tiresmoke in the morning
Image
Image
Garbz

Post by Garbz »

Use the C4

I will rob a lot less power from the 302. A C4 on a small block will out preform a C6 hands down.

Garbz
User avatar
ABA
Posts: 1770
Joined: September 23, 2006, 4:59 pm
Location: South Carolina

Post by ABA »

What are you planning on doing with the truck?
You got a RV cam, so are you going to be pulling a boat or something else where you need a lot of bottom end torque?
'01 F150 Lightning
490RWHP
Gas Mileage? What's that?
Jerry
Garbz

Post by Garbz »

302 and Towing really dont mix well..........Over square bore vs stroke. Needs to rev to do anything. C6 will kill the bottom end torque the little bugger makes there fore negating any advantage.

Any reason they have bellhousings to adapt the C4 to BBF? Must be there weak....

Garbz
User avatar
lincolnslick
Posts: 59
Joined: March 13, 2007, 2:13 pm
Location: victory mills new york

Post by lincolnslick »

i was talking stock trannys and i didnt say the c4 was weak i said the c6 was stronger and i would like to see how long a stock c4 would survive behind a big block
nothing like the smell of tiresmoke in the morning
Image
Image
Garbz

Post by Garbz »

A stock C4 will not bolt to a big block. With the Stock Removable bell.....

The C6 robs too much power from a 302.

In Jims other post he askd about a stang 5 speed. I sincerly doubt he wants to haul the wood anymore.

I would rater have the 300 six in place of a 302 to take advantage of the much larger torque produced in a lighter weight tow application.

Me, I love my C6, but then i have 472 cubes to waste.

Garbz
ELpolacko
Posts: 293
Joined: August 10, 2006, 7:21 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Contact:

Post by ELpolacko »

Food for thought,

I just ran your engine combo through my desktop dyno program to find out where your peaks are with the typical RV cam.

RPM /HP / TQ

1000 / 40 / 212
1500 / 75 / 264
2000 / 107 / 282
2500 / 138 / 291
3000 / 171 / 300
3500 / 201 / 302
4000 / 216 / 284
4500 / 218 / 255
5000 / 204 / 215
5500 / 181 / 173
6000 / 150 / 131

Take into account the C6 will consume about 60HP at 2000 RPM, that is the meat and potatos area you need to be lugging your load from a dead stop.

Short stroke motors are fun to play with at high RPMs. Not for towing or work duty. The C4 eats less power and is plenty rugged for the task at hand.

Just put a good trans cooler on it!
If you do need to get in touch, please use my Email at info@industrialchassisinc.com or post a message on my Facebook Page

Thank you,
Steve
User avatar
FORDMANLCRACKEL
Posts: 1237
Joined: July 11, 2006, 9:48 pm
Location: williamston, n.c.
Contact:
United States of America

Post by FORDMANLCRACKEL »

:iagree:

Lonnie
The most rewarding job i ever had was being a dad.
1988 Ranger Build http://s275.photobucket.com/albums/jj31 ... %20RANGER/
71 LONG BED
Posts: 90
Joined: November 13, 2006, 12:25 pm
Location: Hamburg, New Jersey

Post by 71 LONG BED »

Garbz wrote:Use the C4

I will rob a lot less power from the 302. A C4 on a small block will out preform a C6 hands down.

Garbz

:iagree:

Just in case you're curious, power loss for various auto transmissions:
Please remember these are approximate values, and were provided by Car Craft Magazine.

Powerglide_____18 hp
TH-350________36 hp
TH-400________44 hp
Ford_C-6______55-60 hp
Ford_C-4______28 hp
Ford_FMX______25 hp
Chrysler_A904__25 hp
Chrysler_727___45 hp

I'd go with a manual.
John
Image Image Image
User avatar
FORDBOYpete
Posts: 850
Joined: July 21, 2006, 8:30 am
Location: East Central Florida USA

Post by FORDBOYpete »

:iagree: :roll: :iagree:
C-6 may be stronger. But they also weigh a lot more, run hotter, and are a bear to heft up
into place w/out the right equipment besides robbing power and being slower shifting. :roll:

PLUS, I run a performance Modified C-5 which is the dual pattern Blhsg, commercial version, of a C-4. My engine
is a 460. Is that big enough of a BIG BLOCK? I turn consistent 12.60s through a 31 spline 9" 4-pinion rear gear set.
I am going on my 6th season with this street driven play toy. I have over 30K on the combo. It hasn't broken yet.
Plus, it's roughly .395 sec qwiker in a 1/4 than C-6 was with it's 22% +/-power loss coefficient & heavy extra weight. :hm:

FWIW I have friends running turbos & latahms thru built C-4s. They don't break either.

Obviously a C-4 can be broken but it's RARE if you take care of it, service it regularily,
operate within it's capabilities, and alter it to accept what you plan to do to it. I would advise using an air cooled ATF Cooler
in conjunction with radiator enclosed cooler. Use a Cooler rated for a 25K Lb RV, it will do fine. :thumright:

FBp Bolt.gif
Change is the Only Constant
ELpolacko
Posts: 293
Joined: August 10, 2006, 7:21 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Contact:

Post by ELpolacko »

Here is some more data to chew on.


With your gear set and a non-overdrive transmission like the C4, your RPM at 75 MPH will be 3447 with a 28" tall tire. That puts you right at the peak of your torque.

Not really realated to transmission choice but just interesting information. If you want to play around with gear ratios and tire sizes check out this website.

http://www.randysringandpinion.com/Calculators.aspx
User avatar
Hawkrod
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 21, 2006, 10:57 pm
Location: Apple Valley CA
United States of America

Post by Hawkrod »

Pete and Garbz are correct, for most street trucks a C4 is a much better choice. Even racers prefer them and most classes that allow non-stock trans you will find a C4 behind a big block. there are several companies that make bellhousings for just that swap. The C4 can be built as a beast but even stock it will handle more than most 302's can throw at it. If you need a rugged beast for towing or severe street racing then a C6 is a cheaper alternative than a built C4. Hawkrod
cdherman
Posts: 1048
Joined: July 17, 2006, 6:36 pm
Location: Parkville MO (KC)

Post by cdherman »

I had avery nice converstation with Jay at www.broaderpreformance.com about a year ago.

He was recomended at www.fordmuscle.com as someone that does ford trannies RIGHT.

He asserts, as do several other posters here, that a C4 can be built to handle a helluva lot of power. He also said that TOWING is what kills trannies and particularly when the oil gets hot. He recommended a tranny cooler and temp guage for the ultra cautious.

My dad has C6 in an 88 F250 that pulls 14k of trailer regularly. They have rebuilt it once already -- in 20 years. I am sure that a C4 would have died many times. But the truck is a dog mostly. A faithful dog that will go almost anywhere, but a dog nonetheless.

Unless you have lots of power to spare, or are very un-demanding, or you tow frequently and LOTS, then a decent C4 is all you need. At least that is my belief....
1965 F-100 240 Autolite 1101, Disk brake dual master upgraded, swapped over to C4 and powersteering. Bought by my Dad new in March 65'

1683

Planned/considered upgrades:
Perhaps power brakes, 300 I6 motor and JUST maybe, AC!
Post Reply