Oh man, I need help

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Rusted64
Posts: 389
Joined: January 13, 2011, 3:34 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX
United States of America

Oh man, I need help

Post by Rusted64 »

To all listening/reading,

I have reached a point in my project that could be a problem and be a hurdle.

Trust me; I will try to make this long story as short as possible.

I have recently started my build on my “Rusted 64” (with a frozen 292 engine…..I know, I should have known better, but this was my best chance at a slick at the time).

I have a replacement cab, frame and bed, and now working on the engine and transmission. I really wanted to stay with a 292 and the original 3 speed trans, as I don’t often hit the highway and I wanted that it to stay as close to stock as I can for now.

After getting the engine to the machine shop and starting on cleaning up the sheet metal for the truck, I received a call from the machine shop days later. The shop says that the engine block is scrap, unusable.

So this brings me to an impasse.

My question to you ALL is, what should I do?

Should I try to find a cheap later model vehicle that I can use the powertrain out of, or should I try to find a 292 block and move forward with my original plans?

If I were to move forward with a later model setup, what are your suggestions?

If I were to stay with the original 292, can anyone help me with a block….and other internals as needed?

I would really like to stay with the original 292, but of course, budget is a factor.

I am north of Houston, in The Woodlands, for anyone nearby.

Please HELP!

Thank you greatly,
1964 F100, 292ci

1963 Buick Wildcat, 401ci

They just don't make them like they used to.
Gritsngumbo
Posts: 5441
Joined: August 4, 2007, 4:15 pm
Location: Monroe, Louisiana
United States of America

Post by Gritsngumbo »

I would stay with the 292. Personal preference.
If you understand what you’re doing, you’re not learning anything.


LITTLE RED: 64 F100 Short Style
BIG RED: 62 F100 Long Uni
BIG “UN": 63 F250 Long Flare
BBW RED: 61 F100 CC BBW Long Uni
CRIMSON CREW: 63 F100 "Stageway" Long Flare Crew Cab
"RANGER": 66 F100 CC Long Flatbed
"AVA" 1963 Avion T-20 Travel Trailer
“Lucille” 1955 New Moon 44’ Travel Trailer
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Re: Oh man, I need help

Post by Greg D »

Rusted64 wrote: but of course, budget is a factor.
You can probably buy a running/driving whole car (87-90 Crown Victoria, F 150, etc.) with a 302 & AOD or M5OD to drop in it for less than the overhaul on the Y block - mind you this is before hunting down another block.
Don't get me wrong I love Ys myself - they just simply aren't cheap to rebuild. I personally would find a 5.0 from a 87-93 Mustang, or Explorer or Lincoln and get the roller cam engine (you will have to convert it to a carbed engine) and an AOD. The roller motor makes a little more torque which is good with our trucks.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
Rusted64
Posts: 389
Joined: January 13, 2011, 3:34 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX
United States of America

Re: Oh man, I need help

Post by Rusted64 »

Greg D wrote:
Rusted64 wrote: but of course, budget is a factor.
You can probably buy a running/driving whole car (87-90 Crown Victoria, F 150, etc.) with a 302 & AOD or M5OD to drop in it for less than the overhaul on the Y block - mind you this is before hunting down another block.
Don't get me wrong I love Ys myself - they just simply aren't cheap to rebuild. I personally would find a 5.0 from a 87-93 Mustang, or Explorer or Lincoln and get the roller cam engine (you will have to convert it to a carbed engine) and an AOD. The roller motor makes a little more torque which is good with our trucks.
THis is sort of what I was thinking too, but that would mean more mods to my existing frame, drive, etc.

Just wondering, would it realy be less expensive?
1964 F100, 292ci

1963 Buick Wildcat, 401ci

They just don't make them like they used to.
Rusted64
Posts: 389
Joined: January 13, 2011, 3:34 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX
United States of America

Post by Rusted64 »

Gritsngumbo wrote:I would stay with the 292. Personal preference.
\

This is my preference also, but when it comes to dollars$$$$, I need to be frugal. Especially looking to the future with gas at 4 dollars and other purchases already made fro the project.
1964 F100, 292ci

1963 Buick Wildcat, 401ci

They just don't make them like they used to.
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Post by Greg D »

Bout $150 for the mounting crossmembers - unless you make towers & a tranny crossmember.
All the parts to carb the engine can be had at the junkyard.
I still have to make my tranny crossmember but these towers worked great for the 5.0 - mounts are for a 79 F 150 with a 302. The 292 was sitting on them when I got the truck I only had to enlarge a hole with a reamer for the insulator stud.
5.0 & Overdrive tranny and you should easily be in the mid 20s for fuel mileage.
I can get you patterns & measurements.


Image
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
CoralRed
Posts: 47
Joined: October 28, 2007, 9:07 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta

Post by CoralRed »

Bear in mind that changes always lead to more changes. More power means a brake upgrade. Then you might as well change to power steering, and how about the rearend? Yes, rebuilding the y block will be expensive, more expensive than a used 302 and AOD, but why not consider finding a good used 292? Might take longer, but you can keep it original and save money.
Just a thought; hope this helps.
Rusted64
Posts: 389
Joined: January 13, 2011, 3:34 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX
United States of America

Post by Rusted64 »

Greg D wrote:Bout $150 for the mounting crossmembers - unless you make towers & a tranny crossmember.
All the parts to carb the engine can be had at the junkyard.
I still have to make my tranny crossmember but these towers worked great for the 5.0 - mounts are for a 79 F 150 with a 302. The 292 was sitting on them when I got the truck I only had to enlarge a hole with a reamer for the insulator stud.
5.0 & Overdrive tranny and you should easily be in the mid 20s for fuel mileage.
I can get you patterns & measurements.


Image
See, now you have me day dreaming about what could be.

How much woul I have to pay for the engine and trans though? I know that can vary, but would it be worth doing?

Like it was already said, changes lead to more changes......
1964 F100, 292ci

1963 Buick Wildcat, 401ci

They just don't make them like they used to.
User avatar
The Big M
Posts: 1360
Joined: August 9, 2006, 3:03 pm
Location: Rocky View County, AB
Canada

Post by The Big M »

I'm not sure about your area, but around here 5.0/302's are quite plentiful and cheap. Probably in the $200 range for a running engine, and I recently sold a complete AOD for about $80. Rebuild parts for a 5.0 would certainly be cheaper than they would for the y-block , though I think the machining costs would probably be about the same.
Greg D wrote:I personally would find a 5.0 from a 87-93 Mustang, or Explorer or Lincoln and get the roller cam engine (you will have to convert it to a carbed engine) and an AOD. The roller motor makes a little more torque which is good with our trucks.
Agreed, but Is the extra torque solely a function of the roller cam, or is it also related to the EFI? I was under the impression that the sequential EFI helped increase torque due to the long-runner intake manifold. Just curious because I have the standard output version (Grand Marquis/Crown Vic) but with a factory roller cam.
User avatar
foodstick
Posts: 3364
Joined: March 15, 2006, 6:45 pm

Post by foodstick »

If you like the older stock motors, what about going to the old six inline with the T5 tranny?
User avatar
bird55
Posts: 558
Joined: February 16, 2009, 11:56 am
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
United States of America

Post by bird55 »

Any engine is going to COST to have machining done or buy parts for, relatively. Keep your eyes open for a used, running yblock you can drop in. You can still find them. just my 2 cents.
User avatar
charliemccraney
Posts: 1743
Joined: July 9, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: Lawrenceville, GA

Post by charliemccraney »

Stick with a 292. You'll be glad you did. It's an excellent compromise of power and economy. So far, the only "modern" 302s that get better mileage than I get have been fuel injected 302 roller motors. Anything less than that and it seems you can forget mileage and power. Only one of the few injected roller motors I've heard of got over 20mpg.
If you're patient, you can find a good running 292 to drop in and even if it's not running, a basic 292 rebuild really is not that expensive. The machine work should cost the same as any mainstream engine.

By the way, what exactly are they calling scrap?? A 292 is not one of these puny "modern" engines. If they don't know what they're doing, they could be calling it scrap because it's already .030 over or something, which is nothing for a Y.

Did you know, Rusted, that you're about 3 hours away from one of the best Machine shops in the US for a Y block, Eaton Balancing, builder of the 524hp, 375 ci Engine Masters Y block.
Lawrenceville, Ga
1961 F100 Unibody
318 Y-block (292 +.070 bore, +.170 stroke), FMS T5-Z w/Mustang 10.5" diaphragm clutch.
User avatar
65Lover
Posts: 617
Joined: September 12, 2007, 11:09 am
Location: Manvel TX
Contact:
United States of America

Post by 65Lover »

one for $700 runs
http://tulsa.craigslist.org/pts/2302850526.html

3 for make offer
http://lasvegas.craigslist.org/pts/2331685453.html

Craigslist search
http://www.allofcraigs.com/2009/08/sear ... d7h7s#1882

You can use uship.com to get them shipped to you
Ruth
'65 F-100 Custom Cab SB Styleside
'67 Ford Mustang FB
'68 Mercury Cougar

Slickstock Altoona Iowa
Slickstock Salina Kansas
Gritsngumbo
Posts: 5441
Joined: August 4, 2007, 4:15 pm
Location: Monroe, Louisiana
United States of America

Post by Gritsngumbo »

charliemccraney wrote:By the way, what exactly are they calling scrap?? A 292 is not one of these puny "modern" engines. If they don't know what they're doing, they could be calling it scrap because it's already .030 over or something, which is nothing for a Y.
That's what I was wondering. Check in with Kenny (62galxe), he's near you. He had Ted Eaton help him with his Y-Block.
I know I'm in the minority and maybe it's just me, but I just hate to see anything but a Y or a 223 in a 61-64 truck. If not the "Y" then I'd go all the way with a SOHC or DOHC modular. Why have what everyone else has? Be unique.
Last edited by Gritsngumbo on April 20, 2011, 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
If you understand what you’re doing, you’re not learning anything.


LITTLE RED: 64 F100 Short Style
BIG RED: 62 F100 Long Uni
BIG “UN": 63 F250 Long Flare
BBW RED: 61 F100 CC BBW Long Uni
CRIMSON CREW: 63 F100 "Stageway" Long Flare Crew Cab
"RANGER": 66 F100 CC Long Flatbed
"AVA" 1963 Avion T-20 Travel Trailer
“Lucille” 1955 New Moon 44’ Travel Trailer
ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

i would be looking for another 292.

fact is they are easy to work on ,and swapping an engine for one of the same is always the easiest , least expensive and time consuming way to go.
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
User avatar
unibody madness
Posts: 2147
Joined: December 4, 2008, 4:33 pm
Location: Paradise,CALIFORNIA 95969
United States of America

Post by unibody madness »

Ditto that,
you can always find a used y block or 223 around. try Y-blocksforever forum, or fordsix performance
They really are hard to kill, and if you are that close to Mr. Eaton load it up and swing it by. You will get an honest opinion, and top of the line builder who loves Y-blocks. Either way, it would be great just to visit the man
:2cents:
Turk build thread at:
http://slick60s.com/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=18944

It does not matter what you think, it only matters what you do about it!
Rusted64
Posts: 389
Joined: January 13, 2011, 3:34 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX
United States of America

Post by Rusted64 »

charliemccraney wrote: By the way, what exactly are they calling scrap?? A 292 is not one of these puny "modern" engines. If they don't know what they're doing, they could be calling it scrap because it's already .030 over or something, which is nothing for a Y.
The machine shop I took it too said that they saw a lot of something called "liquid glass" or something in the block that got them concerned. They ran some pressure tests and found that it was not testing satisfactory. I don’t even think it has been bored before.

I do trust this guy, because I took my Buick 401 engine to him and he did a good job. I told him that I would be bringing in a Y block for him to work on and asked if he had any experience with them. His eyes got big and he said that he has done a lot with them and used to own a 56 F100 with one. Of course, everyone does make mistakes on diagnosing, but he seems to know what he is doing.
1964 F100, 292ci

1963 Buick Wildcat, 401ci

They just don't make them like they used to.
User avatar
The Big M
Posts: 1360
Joined: August 9, 2006, 3:03 pm
Location: Rocky View County, AB
Canada

Post by The Big M »

Sounds like it may be cracked then, and may have had a coolant leak at some point:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_sil ... ive_repair

Interesting that it's the same stuff that was used to kill engines during the "cash for clunkers" period. :(
Rusted64
Posts: 389
Joined: January 13, 2011, 3:34 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX
United States of America

Post by Rusted64 »

It looks like I am seeing a majority of you suggesting to stick with the 292 and I have agree. The other options do sound pretty good, but I was really looking forward to the 292.

Also, in an attempt to get it done faster, I have a bunch are parts for the 292 already. Probably a bad idea, but I wasnt expecting the bad news. I just now remembered. So I should probably stay with the 292.

It looks like I will need to be patient and wait for a block or engine to come up that doesnt break my bank.
Last edited by Rusted64 on April 20, 2011, 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1964 F100, 292ci

1963 Buick Wildcat, 401ci

They just don't make them like they used to.
Rusted64
Posts: 389
Joined: January 13, 2011, 3:34 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX
United States of America

Post by Rusted64 »

65Lover wrote:one for $700 runs
http://tulsa.craigslist.org/pts/2302850526.html

3 for make offer
http://lasvegas.craigslist.org/pts/2331685453.html

Craigslist search
http://www.allofcraigs.com/2009/08/sear ... d7h7s#1882

You can use uship.com to get them shipped to you
I will look into these.

That is a pretty cool site, that can search all of craigslist.





Thanks,
1964 F100, 292ci

1963 Buick Wildcat, 401ci

They just don't make them like they used to.
Post Reply