question about tire size and rpm etc.

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Post Reply
sgettin
Posts: 376
Joined: August 29, 2009, 8:43 am
Location: iowa, usa

question about tire size and rpm etc.

Post by sgettin »

finally got my 63 f250 4x4 4sp 292 w/4:56's on the road after about a year in the barn getting worked on. was impressed by the speed and handling, it runs and drives like a really fast tractor(about as noisy also) but thats all fine with me. only thing i'd like to improve is top speed so i'm looking at bigger tires.
anyone have experience with 33's or 34's maybe 35's on my setup? i'm thinking tall and skinny like 255/85/r16 which are 33's. i would like to be able to do 60mph without running the rpm's up too much but with a small v8 like my 292 i'm also a little worried about loosing power. given the price of new tires thought i better get some advice.
clearence? i believe it was iceman who told me 34's are as tall as my truck can handle without a lift kit and i do have the large opening fenders on it now.

thanks for any help.
scott
User avatar
charliemccraney
Posts: 1743
Joined: July 9, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: Lawrenceville, GA

Post by charliemccraney »

You should be around 3100RPM at 60mph right now which isn't bad. The taller tire will impact your towing ability a bit but for cruising it will be fine. A stock 292 is quite torquey for it's size. That's a part of the reason they're so awesome :D
Lawrenceville, Ga
1961 F100 Unibody
318 Y-block (292 +.070 bore, +.170 stroke), FMS T5-Z w/Mustang 10.5" diaphragm clutch.
sgettin
Posts: 376
Joined: August 29, 2009, 8:43 am
Location: iowa, usa

Post by sgettin »

charliemccraney wrote:You should be around 3100RPM at 60mph right now which isn't bad. The taller tire will impact your towing ability a bit but for cruising it will be fine. A stock 292 is quite torquey for it's size. That's a part of the reason they're so awesome :D
so currently with small tires i'm running 3100rpm at 60, my speedo is broke but drove it down the highway yesturday and i was guessing somewhere around 3000rpm at what i thought was 60mph or there abouts. sounds like 33's would be about right. any guess on rpm's at 60 with 33's?
ya i like the 292 better than i thought i would. have say it has an odd sound to it(which i like), doesn't sound like the newer small v8's i've heard. sounds more like my 2020 jd.
User avatar
charliemccraney
Posts: 1743
Joined: July 9, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: Lawrenceville, GA

Post by charliemccraney »

That depends on the tire you're running now. To get a good approximation take 3100 x old diameter / new diameter. So lets say the old tire is 32" tall and the new one is 33" tall, 3100 x 32 / 33 = 3006, so that will take about 100 rpm off at the same road speed.
Lawrenceville, Ga
1961 F100 Unibody
318 Y-block (292 +.070 bore, +.170 stroke), FMS T5-Z w/Mustang 10.5" diaphragm clutch.
User avatar
HiBoy63
Posts: 1235
Joined: March 12, 2007, 1:48 pm
Location: Colbert Wa
Ireland

Post by HiBoy63 »

1963 F250 4x4x292
1965 F100 4x4x352
1998 F150 4x4x4.6
2001 Sport Track 4x4x4.0

In case you are wondering thats Ireland......Freedom is not Free!!!!!!!!

Heritage country Flag
jamesdfo
Posts: 1637
Joined: February 15, 2011, 10:32 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Canada

Post by jamesdfo »

If you want to take the easy way out, there are a number of online sites that will do the calc's for you, but if you want to run the numbers yourself, here is the formula. I used to have it in the SOLVER mode on my scientific calculator, which would then let me solve for any of the variables.

MPH = (Tire Diameter x RPM) / (336 x Axle Ratio)

http://bob123e.tripod.com/askbob/Gear_R ... ulator.htm

http://www.apexgarage.com/tech/gear_ratios.shtml

http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculators.htm

HTH
James
factorystock
Posts: 440
Joined: December 31, 2007, 5:42 pm
Location: westcoast

Re: question about tire size and rpm etc.

Post by factorystock »

sgettin wrote: i'm thinking tall and skinny
I would be thinking the factory optional 19.5". Check out an old auction ebay 110730278766.
sgettin
Posts: 376
Joined: August 29, 2009, 8:43 am
Location: iowa, usa

Post by sgettin »

thanks everyone for the help. checked out the calculators and looks like with 33's i'll be running about 2800rpm at 60 (although i am little confused as to if i have to take into account my transmission gear ratio and to be honest i don't know what that is). anyway i can live with 2800rpm at 60mph. 35's would lower my rpms more but are pbly a bit much for my truck and tires that tall would might eat up too much horsepower for my 292 anyway.
checked out the ebay auction factory stock, interesting and probably rare. they would definately get me some height and skinny also with a 5.25" width.

thanks
scott
User avatar
charliemccraney
Posts: 1743
Joined: July 9, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: Lawrenceville, GA

Post by charliemccraney »

sgettin wrote:35's would lower my rpms more but are pbly a bit much for my truck and tires that tall would might eat up too much horsepower for my 292 anyway.

thanks
scott
Mine turns about 2500rpm @60mph in 4th gear (1:1) and about 1750rpm in 5th (.63od). Yours should not have a problem with the 35s so long as they'll fit.
Lawrenceville, Ga
1961 F100 Unibody
318 Y-block (292 +.070 bore, +.170 stroke), FMS T5-Z w/Mustang 10.5" diaphragm clutch.
sgettin
Posts: 376
Joined: August 29, 2009, 8:43 am
Location: iowa, usa

Post by sgettin »

charliemccraney wrote:
sgettin wrote:35's would lower my rpms more but are pbly a bit much for my truck and tires that tall would might eat up too much horsepower for my 292 anyway.

thanks
scott
Mine turns about 2500rpm @60mph in 4th gear (1:1) and about 1750rpm in 5th (.63od). Yours should not have a problem with the 35s so long as they'll fit.
The tire shop i deal with is pretty good to work with so i'll try to throw the monkey on the their back as far as fitment goes. guess i better stop by after work this week and see what they got.
jamesdfo
Posts: 1637
Joined: February 15, 2011, 10:32 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Canada

Post by jamesdfo »

As long as the trans you are running does not have an overdriven top gear, you are OK (ie: your top gear is 1:1 ratio).
If your trans did have overdrive, and the online calculator you were using did not have a window to input the overdrive ratio, then you would simply take the answer (RPM) and multiply it by the overdrive ratio. (eg: 2800RPM x 0.7 = 1960 RPM), or alternatively for MPH, at the same RPM, you would divide the MPH by the overdrive ratio, ( 60 MPH/0.7) netting 85.7 MPH @ the same RPM as you would be turning @ 1:1 (direct drive).....

The trick is to find the sweet spot, as gearing too tall mans the RPM will fall too far below the torque peak, and that means at best it would feel "gutless" and at worst it would actually consume more fuel than it would at a higher RPM, but with less load........

James
sgettin wrote: i am little confused as to if i have to take into account my transmission gear ratio and to be honest i don't know what that is).

thanks
scott
ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

fact:
my 66 f250 4x4 w 292, 4 speed and 4.56 turns 2900@ 70 mph w 255/16 tires.

292 was not offered in 66 so i have the only y powered 66 i know of. 8)
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
sgettin
Posts: 376
Joined: August 29, 2009, 8:43 am
Location: iowa, usa

Post by sgettin »

[quote="jamesdfo"]As long as the trans you are running does not have an overdriven top gear, you are OK (ie: your top gear is 1:1 ratio).
If your trans did have overdrive, and the online calculator you were using did not have a window to input the overdrive ratio, then you would simply take the answer (RPM) and multiply it by the overdrive ratio. (eg: 2800RPM x 0.7 = 1960 RPM), or alternatively for MPH, at the same RPM, you would divide the MPH by the overdrive ratio, ( 60 MPH/0.7) netting 85.7 MPH @ the same RPM as you would be turning @ 1:1 (direct drive).....

The trick is to find the sweet spot, as gearing too tall mans the RPM will fall too far below the torque peak, and that means at best it would feel "gutless" and at worst it would actually consume more fuel than it would at a higher RPM, but with less load........

James

thanks james for clearing that up concerning the transmision ratio. had me stumped but at a 1 to 1 ratio apparently it cancels itself out. finding the sweet spot you're referring to is difficult because i have no experience with slicks. from what folks are telling me sounds like 33's will fit the truck and still keep my power range in the right place or the truck would pbly run good on 35's also.

qoute iceman:
fact:
my 66 f250 4x4 w 292, 4 speed and 4.56 turns 2900@ 70 mph w 255/16 tires.

got me a little stumped because the calculator says your diff should be more like a 370:1 inorder to run 2900@70 but if thats what is then thats what it is. 2900 @ 70 would work for me.
i like the looks of 35's but i think they may rub and i just get the feeling i'll loose to much power. i remember my brother upgrading his jeep cherokee to tires an inch or two taller and he wished he had never done it, lost a lot of power.
i've looked on craigslist for some used junk tires to try out but haven't seen any thing cheap yet.

thanks for the input.
User avatar
charliemccraney
Posts: 1743
Joined: July 9, 2008, 10:02 pm
Location: Lawrenceville, GA

Post by charliemccraney »

Your stock 292 should pull the 35s just fine. You should still be a good bit over 2000rpm. The way my motor is built, it lost a noticeable amount of torque on the low end but it still manages to pull 60mph at about 1750 rpm in overdrive. A stock 292 with a stronger low end will not have trouble with that same road speed at a higher rpm.

RE the descrepancy between observed RPM and calculated RPM, the calculators do not take into account what I'll call the functional diameter of the tire, which is the diameter which varies with the load and air pressure. The calculators are best as an approximation and while they may not provide the exact RPM you'll see, the difference in RPM should be pretty close.
Lawrenceville, Ga
1961 F100 Unibody
318 Y-block (292 +.070 bore, +.170 stroke), FMS T5-Z w/Mustang 10.5" diaphragm clutch.
ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

my tires are actually 265s, not sure how much that changes the calculation but there is no fitment issues.

will be swapping to winter tires soon,
8.75 x16.5, will see how much that changes the rpms
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
jamesdfo
Posts: 1637
Joined: February 15, 2011, 10:32 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Canada

Post by jamesdfo »

Brian: you didn't mention the aspect ratio?? (ie: 265/75/16?)...75% aspect ratio is likely the safest bet, but it could be one of the others:)

James
jamon8
Posts: 13
Joined: May 28, 2010, 11:29 pm
Location: s. IL
Contact:

Post by jamon8 »

how do you change the gears in the tailshaft to have the speedo work with bigger tires
Post Reply