Wasn't somebody wanting a Napco 4x4?
Wasn't somebody wanting a Napco 4x4?
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942
1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD
~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............
Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942
1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD
~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............
Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
I don't even know where to start responding. First, no matter if it is a Napco or a Ford it isn't worth that kind of money. Second if it is a Napco then it isn't a factory Ford 4X4 as he says and if it is a factory Ford 4X4 then it isn't a Napco. Finally, has anybody seen a restored slick bring 15-20K? The guy is just full of it. He has a $500 parts truck at best that may be restorable but it isn't the best start I have ever seen. Hawkrod
Napco was a company that did aftermarket 4X4 conversions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napco_Four ... e_Vehicles. Hawkrod
- RlCHARD CRANlUM
- Posts: 62
- Joined: July 21, 2006, 1:38 pm
- Location: GuateMolalla
RC,RlCHARD CRANlUM wrote:Shouldn't a Napco conversion be passenger side drop? It looks like a run of the mill F-100 4x4 to me. Poor picture quality, but that rear axle looks five lug. There's a 64 F-350 Napco 4x4 not far from that my wife won't let me buy.
I'm not anywhere near an authority regarding older or NAPCO 4x4s, so I have to ask: What are you talking about?
BarnieTrk
-
semotrucker
- Posts: 489
- Joined: December 30, 2006, 12:24 pm
- Location: Morley Mo
Thats the one I posted a couple months ago.
http://fordtruk.com/forums/viewtopic.ph ... ht=#129536
Cam
http://fordtruk.com/forums/viewtopic.ph ... ht=#129536
Cam
-
factorystock
- Posts: 440
- Joined: December 31, 2007, 5:42 pm
- Location: westcoast
During the 60's, Ford built 1/2 and 3/4 ton 4X4's, 1 tons were farmed out to Napco for conversion. Ford felt there was not enough market for them.My take on this one, dont believe everything you read. I would say that shade of dark green was used by Pacific Bell, the forest service used a lighter greenish gray color. It probably had a utility bed on it at on time also.
- RlCHARD CRANlUM
- Posts: 62
- Joined: July 21, 2006, 1:38 pm
- Location: GuateMolalla
I'm no expert either. But of the few Napco conversions I've seen, they were all passenger side drop axles (the differential is on the passenger side of the axle)BarnieTrk wrote: RC,
I'm not anywhere near an authority regarding older or NAPCO 4x4s, so I have to ask: What are you talking about?
BarnieTrk
Follow this link (to lazy to rehost the image), it shows some Napco conversions. Notice the front diff is on the passenger side.
http://www.napco4x4.org/gallery/data/50 ... ug_166.jpg
The truck in question has the front diff on the driver's side. It also doesn't look very tall. All of the Napco rigs I've seen were pretty tall. Probably for drive train clearance. I'd say it's a factory 4x4.
Ahh,,,, I see what you mean. Thanks for the reply & the NAPCO ID tip!RlCHARD CRANlUM wrote:I'm no expert either. But of the few Napco conversions I've seen, they were all passenger side drop axles (the differential is on the passenger side of the axle)BarnieTrk wrote: RC,
I'm not anywhere near an authority regarding older or NAPCO 4x4s, so I have to ask: What are you talking about?
BarnieTrk
Follow this link (to lazy to rehost the image), it shows some Napco conversions. Notice the front diff is on the passenger side.
http://www.napco4x4.org/gallery/data/50 ... ug_166.jpg
The truck in question has the front diff on the driver's side. It also doesn't look very tall. All of the Napco rigs I've seen were pretty tall. Probably for drive train clearance. I'd say it's a factory 4x4.
BarnieTrk


