Wasn't somebody wanting a Napco 4x4?

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Post Reply
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Wasn't somebody wanting a Napco 4x4?

Post by Greg D »

1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
User avatar
johnzmu
Posts: 230
Joined: August 21, 2009, 8:23 pm
Location: Fort Macleod Alberta

Post by johnzmu »

I thought by then, ford was builing their own 4x4. or did they do both?
BarnieTrk
Posts: 1448
Joined: July 11, 2007, 2:37 pm
Location: Stanton, Michigan

Post by BarnieTrk »

I didn't realize those early NAPCO 4x4s were really worth all that... :shock:

BarnieTrk 8)
User avatar
Hawkrod
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 21, 2006, 10:57 pm
Location: Apple Valley CA
United States of America

Post by Hawkrod »

I don't even know where to start responding. First, no matter if it is a Napco or a Ford it isn't worth that kind of money. Second if it is a Napco then it isn't a factory Ford 4X4 as he says and if it is a factory Ford 4X4 then it isn't a Napco. Finally, has anybody seen a restored slick bring 15-20K? The guy is just full of it. He has a $500 parts truck at best that may be restorable but it isn't the best start I have ever seen. Hawkrod
User avatar
66ford
Posts: 427
Joined: January 18, 2010, 2:03 pm
Location: Upstate New York

Post by 66ford »

whats the story on this NAPCO Thing?
Image
1966 LWB 352
1969 Fairlane Conv't, 302.
16 and loving life.
R.I.P Cam
User avatar
Hawkrod
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 21, 2006, 10:57 pm
Location: Apple Valley CA
United States of America

Post by Hawkrod »

Napco was a company that did aftermarket 4X4 conversions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napco_Four ... e_Vehicles. Hawkrod
User avatar
RlCHARD CRANlUM
Posts: 62
Joined: July 21, 2006, 1:38 pm
Location: GuateMolalla

Post by RlCHARD CRANlUM »

Shouldn't a Napco conversion be passenger side drop? It looks like a run of the mill F-100 4x4 to me. Poor picture quality, but that rear axle looks five lug. There's a 64 F-350 Napco 4x4 not far from that my wife won't let me buy.
BarnieTrk
Posts: 1448
Joined: July 11, 2007, 2:37 pm
Location: Stanton, Michigan

Post by BarnieTrk »

RlCHARD CRANlUM wrote:Shouldn't a Napco conversion be passenger side drop? It looks like a run of the mill F-100 4x4 to me. Poor picture quality, but that rear axle looks five lug. There's a 64 F-350 Napco 4x4 not far from that my wife won't let me buy.
RC,
I'm not anywhere near an authority regarding older or NAPCO 4x4s, so I have to ask: What are you talking about? shrug.gif
BarnieTrk :peepwall:
semotrucker
Posts: 489
Joined: December 30, 2006, 12:24 pm
Location: Morley Mo

Post by semotrucker »

Thats the one I posted a couple months ago.

http://fordtruk.com/forums/viewtopic.ph ... ht=#129536

Cam
factorystock
Posts: 440
Joined: December 31, 2007, 5:42 pm
Location: westcoast

Post by factorystock »

During the 60's, Ford built 1/2 and 3/4 ton 4X4's, 1 tons were farmed out to Napco for conversion. Ford felt there was not enough market for them.My take on this one, dont believe everything you read. I would say that shade of dark green was used by Pacific Bell, the forest service used a lighter greenish gray color. It probably had a utility bed on it at on time also.
User avatar
RlCHARD CRANlUM
Posts: 62
Joined: July 21, 2006, 1:38 pm
Location: GuateMolalla

Post by RlCHARD CRANlUM »

BarnieTrk wrote: RC,
I'm not anywhere near an authority regarding older or NAPCO 4x4s, so I have to ask: What are you talking about? shrug.gif
BarnieTrk :peepwall:
I'm no expert either. But of the few Napco conversions I've seen, they were all passenger side drop axles (the differential is on the passenger side of the axle)

Follow this link (to lazy to rehost the image), it shows some Napco conversions. Notice the front diff is on the passenger side.
http://www.napco4x4.org/gallery/data/50 ... ug_166.jpg

The truck in question has the front diff on the driver's side. It also doesn't look very tall. All of the Napco rigs I've seen were pretty tall. Probably for drive train clearance. I'd say it's a factory 4x4.
BarnieTrk
Posts: 1448
Joined: July 11, 2007, 2:37 pm
Location: Stanton, Michigan

Post by BarnieTrk »

RlCHARD CRANlUM wrote:
BarnieTrk wrote: RC,
I'm not anywhere near an authority regarding older or NAPCO 4x4s, so I have to ask: What are you talking about? shrug.gif
BarnieTrk :peepwall:
I'm no expert either. But of the few Napco conversions I've seen, they were all passenger side drop axles (the differential is on the passenger side of the axle)

Follow this link (to lazy to rehost the image), it shows some Napco conversions. Notice the front diff is on the passenger side.
http://www.napco4x4.org/gallery/data/50 ... ug_166.jpg

The truck in question has the front diff on the driver's side. It also doesn't look very tall. All of the Napco rigs I've seen were pretty tall. Probably for drive train clearance. I'd say it's a factory 4x4.
Ahh,,,, I see what you mean. Thanks for the reply & the NAPCO ID tip!

BarnieTrk :steering:
Post Reply