gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Post Reply
sgettin
Posts: 376
Joined: August 29, 2009, 8:43 am
Location: iowa, usa

gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

Post by sgettin »

292 w/4sp. 200 mi round trip. 55/60 on the 4lane, fairly light load and decent headwind on the way back didn't seem to make much difference. went 13mpg which is better than i would have guessed since i've read 8-10 isn't uncommon. just fyi.
bruceandersson
Posts: 906
Joined: August 12, 2009, 9:44 am
Location: Ohio

Re: gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

Post by bruceandersson »

It will depend on your rear end ratio and how fast you drive. I've owned a lot of 3/4 ton and larger 4x4s and found that the single biggest factor was the speed. I could get 17+ MPG at 55, but would drop below 10 at 70. The interesting thing was that it did not seem to matter how much I was carrying or towing. I could have a full load and tow another vehicle and only lose 1-2 MPG.
Gritsngumbo
Posts: 5441
Joined: August 4, 2007, 4:15 pm
Location: Monroe, Louisiana
United States of America

Re: gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

Post by Gritsngumbo »

That MPG figure sounds pretty reasonable to me.
If you understand what you’re doing, you’re not learning anything.


LITTLE RED: 64 F100 Short Style
BIG RED: 62 F100 Long Uni
BIG “UN": 63 F250 Long Flare
BBW RED: 61 F100 CC BBW Long Uni
CRIMSON CREW: 63 F100 "Stageway" Long Flare Crew Cab
"RANGER": 66 F100 CC Long Flatbed
"AVA" 1963 Avion T-20 Travel Trailer
“Lucille” 1955 New Moon 44’ Travel Trailer
sgettin
Posts: 376
Joined: August 29, 2009, 8:43 am
Location: iowa, usa

Re: gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

Post by sgettin »

forgot to mention it's got 4:56's. i'd would guess the lack of difference in mileage loaded vs unloaded is because the truck is geared low = you get what you get regardless.

13 sounds reasonable enough to me also, not quite as good as a yaris but hey it's 49yrs old (not quite as fast either).
User avatar
foodstick
Posts: 3364
Joined: March 15, 2006, 6:45 pm

Re: gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

Post by foodstick »

Dad always said 13 loaded, 13 empty ;)

I told Kid that if two guys got together and towed one of their trucks...technically they would BOTH be getting 26 MPG :lol:

honestly that the cheapest way to do a Slickstock ! Sorta like those two car Daytona drafts ;)
sgettin
Posts: 376
Joined: August 29, 2009, 8:43 am
Location: iowa, usa

Re: gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

Post by sgettin »

foodstick wrote: I told Kid that if two guys got together and towed one of their trucks...technically they would BOTH be getting 26 MPG
that's amazing you should inform president obama, gas prices will be cut in half!.
stenrock96
Posts: 1
Joined: May 20, 2012, 1:42 pm

Re: gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

Post by stenrock96 »

hey I've got a 63 f100 2wd 223 3 speed. what kind of gas milage can i expect from it?
sgettin
Posts: 376
Joined: August 29, 2009, 8:43 am
Location: iowa, usa

Re: gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

Post by sgettin »

stenrock96 wrote:hey I've got a 63 f100 2wd 223 3 speed. what kind of gas milage can i expect from it?
i think you'll need to post your rear diff ratio.

i haven't got a clue but i'll guess 16-18 until someone else chimes in.
RickySlickUHS
Posts: 16
Joined: January 11, 2012, 12:23 pm

Re: gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

Post by RickySlickUHS »

Mine is a 63' 223, 3 speed and I average about 200-220 per tank. Around 12-13 mpg or so.
BarnieTrk
Posts: 1448
Joined: July 11, 2007, 2:37 pm
Location: Stanton, Michigan

Re: gas mileage. 63 f240 4x4.

Post by BarnieTrk »

sgettin wrote:forgot to mention it's got 4:56's. i'd would guess the lack of difference in mileage loaded vs unloaded is because the truck is geared low = you get what you get regardless. 13 sounds reasonable enough to me... .
Another factor to consider when considering mileage would be tire size.
A taller tire will allow the engine to operate at a lower RPM than if the truck was wearing shorter tires.

Considering you've got 4.56 differential gears and your final gear (4th) is a 1:1 ratio, then by changing tire size, for instance:
If you had 29" tall tires, your engine would turn at 3150 rpms.
If you had 32" tall tires, your engine would turn at 2870 rpms.

That is 280 rpms less....USUALLY means less fuel consumed.

:2cents: BarnieTrk
Post Reply