bump (not slick)

A place for discussion of off topic subjects. Pretty much anything goes - just keep it civil, please!

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

ezernut9mm wrote:brian: damn, i don't know what cauliflower ears are as far as trucks go. lol
how many bumps have you seen where the person removing the radio has bent the mounting ears forward to take out the radio then bent them back?
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
User avatar
ezernut9mm
Posts: 9141
Joined: July 21, 2006, 9:37 pm
Location: KCMO
Sweden

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by ezernut9mm »

Casey 65 wrote:Wait Chris! 3 vehicles per person... 4 people in the house... that's 12 vehicles, go get some more!!! :D
i like the way you think sir. thank you.

alan, it seems to have some power, but i were to spend the retail dollars that the carb, intake and headers cost, i think i would just put a 75 shot on it and see how long it would last. lol
always
"i believe i've achieved satisfaction".-bubbles
"should i be gettin" baked for this boys?"-bubbles


i could no longer keep "r.i.p.ing" all of our fallen brothers and sisters, so i say here, slick loads of love and much respect to all you beautiful people.
User avatar
ezernut9mm
Posts: 9141
Joined: July 21, 2006, 9:37 pm
Location: KCMO
Sweden

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by ezernut9mm »

ICEMAN6166 wrote:
ezernut9mm wrote:brian: damn, i don't know what cauliflower ears are as far as trucks go. lol
how many bumps have you seen where the person removing the radio has bent the mounting ears forward to take out the radio then bent them back?
ahh, now i got ya. at least he didn't break them off. i got a real nice bezel, now i just have to find that old philco i have laying around.
always
"i believe i've achieved satisfaction".-bubbles
"should i be gettin" baked for this boys?"-bubbles


i could no longer keep "r.i.p.ing" all of our fallen brothers and sisters, so i say here, slick loads of love and much respect to all you beautiful people.
User avatar
Alan Mclennan
Posts: 9324
Joined: October 14, 2006, 6:16 pm
Location: In the shed... Cranebrook NSW
Australia

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by Alan Mclennan »

Hey I see a trend here!, another I6, and we thought you liked V8`s! :rotflmao:
Honey, If I say I`ll fix something I will, there`s no need to remind me every 6 months!!
66 f100 tabletop swb 351 Clevo C6 "Beryl"

Slick Stock 3 KCMO
Slick Stock 4 Altoona
Slick Stock 5 KCMO
Slick Stock 6 Altoona
Slick Stock 7 Salina KS
Slick Stock 8.............................. cry.gif
User avatar
ezernut9mm
Posts: 9141
Joined: July 21, 2006, 9:37 pm
Location: KCMO
Sweden

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by ezernut9mm »

this almost sounds like a v8. duals into a magnaflow with w 3" mitered tip. lol
always
"i believe i've achieved satisfaction".-bubbles
"should i be gettin" baked for this boys?"-bubbles


i could no longer keep "r.i.p.ing" all of our fallen brothers and sisters, so i say here, slick loads of love and much respect to all you beautiful people.
User avatar
66fordtrucknut
Posts: 1289
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:48 pm
Location: Eastern Shore - MD

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by 66fordtrucknut »

My very 1st Ford truck was a 70' that was my Dad's, and the only new vehicle he ever bought new, paid cash for it, I think it was like 2,000 dollars, I was 8. I was gonna say I have a bezel if you wanted it, but it sounds like you have one.
62' SWB uni 223
66' F-100 Short/wide 352
78' F-350 dually dumpbed 400
12' F-150 5.0 3:73 LS
ras4434

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by ras4434 »

I dont get it...I just park them around the corner or down the street. I get home a couple hours earlier that the wife. Gives me time to play then move them around. That way there only one or two that dont run on the property. The other day she came home and told me about a truck just like mine down the street :roll: Told her I should go down and look at it. I had owned it for about a month. She finally caught on but as long as there are no tickets or the neighbors are not threatening all is right with the world. I wonder if there is a neighborhood limit?????
User avatar
Toyz
Posts: 4334
Joined: March 22, 2011, 6:23 pm
Location: Baja Houston Taxes
United States of America

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by Toyz »

Wouldn't work in my neighborhood! The neighbors would be at the door, "hey, Connie, we found one of Paul's stray trucks down the street!" :oops:
Paul
The Ford Orphanage
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
User avatar
kstones63
Posts: 1504
Joined: April 7, 2007, 10:55 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ
United States of America

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by kstones63 »

Casey 65 wrote:Wait Chris! 3 vehicles per person... 4 people in the house... that's 12 vehicles, go get some more!!! :D
I like the way that you're thinking.

Kevin
kstones63
_______________________________________
63 F100
29 Ford Sedan Delivery
99 F250 PSD, 4x4, CC
95 F350 Flatbed Dually Diesel
65TremecGT
Posts: 669
Joined: July 23, 2006, 12:33 pm
Location: So Cal
United States of America

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by 65TremecGT »

Nice litte pickup! You really dont see very many short bump steps.
1965 Ford F-100 Short bed Custom Cab, Worn out six for now.
1966 F-250 Ranger waiting for a 79 460/C6 + Disc Brake and PS swap
Leeroy
Posts: 1115
Joined: July 12, 2009, 3:52 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Australia

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by Leeroy »

Wait Chris! 3 vehicles per person... 4 people in the house... that's 12 vehicles, go get some more!!!
Amen to that!
User avatar
ezernut9mm
Posts: 9141
Joined: July 21, 2006, 9:37 pm
Location: KCMO
Sweden

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by ezernut9mm »

got the clifford on and ditched the offy. runs better, but still have some problems. it is at the bottom of the idle adjustment screw and is idling at 1k. seems like it pulls vacuum to the advance all the time. even at idle. it is timed off the charts according to the marks. when i try to back it down to 14btdc and up the idle i get a random popping thru the exhaust. i dunno. i am gonna drop it and sell it.
always
"i believe i've achieved satisfaction".-bubbles
"should i be gettin" baked for this boys?"-bubbles


i could no longer keep "r.i.p.ing" all of our fallen brothers and sisters, so i say here, slick loads of love and much respect to all you beautiful people.
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by Greg D »

ras4434 wrote:The other day she came home and told me about a truck just like mine down the street :roll: Told her I should go down and look at it. I had owned it for about a month.
This Gentleman deserves a Medal!
LOL
That looks real good Chris.
You could always slip an M5OD in the Bump and ditch the Ranger...........
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
User avatar
ezernut9mm
Posts: 9141
Joined: July 21, 2006, 9:37 pm
Location: KCMO
Sweden

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by ezernut9mm »

thought about that, but it's so hard to get rid of something that gets 27mpg and just starts and runs perfect when you want it to.
always
"i believe i've achieved satisfaction".-bubbles
"should i be gettin" baked for this boys?"-bubbles


i could no longer keep "r.i.p.ing" all of our fallen brothers and sisters, so i say here, slick loads of love and much respect to all you beautiful people.
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by Greg D »

ezernut9mm wrote:thought about that, but it's so hard to get rid of something that gets 27mpg and just starts and runs perfect when you want it to.
With the 240 and an OD tranny the Bump would be around 23 - 25 I'd think.
The 92 I had could get around that - 55 MPH and no headwind but still - that bump weighs less than the 92.
If I didn't do and 80 mile round trip to work - I'd ditch my Ranger for another old truck for a driver so fast it wouldn't be funny.
And I Like my Ranger........
Now,
I know where I could probably get a Model A pickup, swap the body onto the Ranger chassis.
Well, just thinkin..............
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
User avatar
Toyz
Posts: 4334
Joined: March 22, 2011, 6:23 pm
Location: Baja Houston Taxes
United States of America

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by Toyz »

Greg D wrote:
ezernut9mm wrote:thought about that, but it's so hard to get rid of something that gets 27mpg and just starts and runs perfect when you want it to.
With the 240 and an OD tranny the Bump would be around 23 - 25 I'd think.
The 92 I had could get around that - 55 MPH and no headwind but still - that bump weighs less than the 92.
If I didn't do and 80 mile round trip to work - I'd ditch my Ranger for another old truck for a driver so fast it wouldn't be funny.
And I Like my Ranger........
Now,
I know where I could probably get a Model A pickup, swap the body onto the Ranger chassis.
Well, just thinkin..............
OR, get the "A", find a Ranger frame, slip in a 2.3T and a T56 (helps the C.O.G. :idea: ), get 28-30 mpg, and out-run most vehicles!
Build it and they will come!
Paul
The Ford Orphanage
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Re: bump (not slick)

Post by Greg D »

Toyz wrote:
Greg D wrote:
ezernut9mm wrote:thought about that, but it's so hard to get rid of something that gets 27mpg and just starts and runs perfect when you want it to.
With the 240 and an OD tranny the Bump would be around 23 - 25 I'd think.
The 92 I had could get around that - 55 MPH and no headwind but still - that bump weighs less than the 92.
If I didn't do and 80 mile round trip to work - I'd ditch my Ranger for another old truck for a driver so fast it wouldn't be funny.
And I Like my Ranger........
Now,
I know where I could probably get a Model A pickup, swap the body onto the Ranger chassis.
Well, just thinkin..............
OR, get the "A", find a Ranger frame, slip in a 2.3T and a T56 (helps the C.O.G. :idea: ), get 28-30 mpg, and out-run most vehicles!
Build it and they will come!
Paul
I already got a 2.3 Ranger........

You Sir,
are a trouble maker..........
LOL
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
Post Reply