Attention all slick 64 owners!

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Post Reply
craigerf100
Posts: 33
Joined: April 25, 2013, 6:20 am
Location: Springfield (Ozark) MO

Attention all slick 64 owners!

Post by craigerf100 »

have any of you added a brake booster onto your 64? if so please tell me how you did, give me the details.

thanks :cheers:
1964 F-100 Custom Cab Short Bed
1968 F-100 Ranger Short Bed
1967 Fairlane 500 Convertable
1967 Fairlane GT/A 289ci SOLD
User avatar
Shadow
Posts: 1173
Joined: January 6, 2011, 7:19 pm
Location: Topeka Kansas

Re: Attention all slick 64 owners!

Post by Shadow »

Here's What I Used On My 64'. Its A 7" Dual Diaphragm From Performance Online With The Drum/Drum Setup. http://www.performanceonline.com/1957-6 ... KIT-17990/
User avatar
bird55
Posts: 558
Joined: February 16, 2009, 11:56 am
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
United States of America

Re: Attention all slick 64 owners!

Post by bird55 »

FYI, I put disc up front and a new dual MC and proportioning valve WITHOUT the booster. Works great without extra expense of a booster. IMHO.
User avatar
cwindsor
Posts: 334
Joined: January 4, 2012, 11:59 am

Re: Attention all slick 64 owners!

Post by cwindsor »

I added the same one from the link above and used the Speedway disc kit... They had the best price shipped and worked like a charm. :mrgreen:
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Re: Attention all slick 64 owners!

Post by Greg D »

I don't run a booster with my disc setup either, the positive, solid pedal feel is simply awesome!
If I get the 79 I am looking at that needs a booster I may just delete it.
You really don't need power with disc brakes.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
craigerf100
Posts: 33
Joined: April 25, 2013, 6:20 am
Location: Springfield (Ozark) MO

Re: Attention all slick 64 owners!

Post by craigerf100 »

k cool thanks guys. i noticed in that kit that the booster has an adjustable push rod that connects to the brake pedal. im gonna have to find a just a booster that has one. thanks again
1964 F-100 Custom Cab Short Bed
1968 F-100 Ranger Short Bed
1967 Fairlane 500 Convertable
1967 Fairlane GT/A 289ci SOLD
graybeard
Posts: 193
Joined: July 4, 2012, 1:49 pm
United States of America

Re: Attention all slick 64 owners!

Post by graybeard »

Greg D wrote:I don't run a booster with my disc setup either, the positive, solid pedal feel is simply awesome!
If I get the 79 I am looking at that needs a booster I may just delete it.
You really don't need power with disc brakes.
The opprotunity came up to buy a '67 and or a '68 OKLA Highway Patrol cruizer from a gentelman in OKC. The '67 was sweet, the '68 not so sweet. Thought about it a while, bought them both. Took the '68 home first, pulled the PI intake, replaced it with cast iron. Turned around sold it the next week, a few bucks a head of both of them. Earl Shived the doors & roof back white. Drove it for about a year, had a blast. Raced it at the Shelby meet drags in Tulsa.

As far as I could tell that '67 came with four piston Kelsey Hays disc, single resivoir fruit jar M.C. NO BOOSTER. If it had a proportioning valve I couldn't ever find it. The impression it left on me was the 428 would easily care it into the 125 MPH range and the brakes would stop it in a lot less time.

In the search to make everybody happy engineers have made a lot of cars way more complicated than they need to be.
If you can't run with the big dogs "STAY UNDER THE PORCH" !!!!!
Post Reply