Whew! Look at this one.

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Whew! Look at this one.

Post by Greg D »

Need a big piggy bank for this one! http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ford-F-1 ... 4324QQrdZ1
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Post by Greg D »

1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
User avatar
Johnny Canuck
Posts: 8291
Joined: April 9, 2006, 11:14 pm
Location: Edmonton, Alberta.
Canada

Post by Johnny Canuck »

Both links go the same place, Greg.

Nice truck, but how do you go... whoops it's not a 390, its a 428....
especially since you had the motor apart to redo the heads :?:
Also wonder where he found a rare Stainless Steel '65 grille to rechrome
but it has has that cool DYNAMITE :shock: under the hidden surfaces!

Apparently, someone else did the work..
It's a race.. Will hell freeze over or will JC finish his truck first. Stay tuned..
willy3486
Posts: 817
Joined: July 11, 2006, 10:31 am
Location: Smithville TN

Post by willy3486 »

3 questions I have. Why didn't they put bac in the original padded dash? In 86 you could still find decent padded dashes then. Or at least here you could. If the grill was stainless and in good shape why would you chrome it? And 3rd They say they took so much effort and worked so hard restoring it. If so why didn't they take out those plastic plugs in the door area. You can see they left them in and painted them.
User avatar
Johnny Canuck
Posts: 8291
Joined: April 9, 2006, 11:14 pm
Location: Edmonton, Alberta.
Canada

Post by Johnny Canuck »

Curious as to why you would have a $1.98 item like this on your steering wheel if it wasn't cracked..
Image
It's a race.. Will hell freeze over or will JC finish his truck first. Stay tuned..
Willy_B
Posts: 24
Joined: February 13, 2007, 2:33 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by Willy_B »

Did they ever (besides the XL) put anything stock larger than a 390 in slicks? From my understanding the answer would be- NO!
Garbz

Post by Garbz »

Johnny yer just jealous like me....

Its a 65. A dash pad is optional equipment and i see no holes along the top of the dash near the windshield for the aluminum trim so it probally never had one.

Has new ball joints too!

As to a 428.... No way to tell them apart frm a 352 without a bore and stroke check.. seeing as a 428 used a 4.130 bore it is the only way...Or remove the freeze plugs and 428 is cast into the one bank of cylender walls, some times but not always. Heads should be C8AE6090 with the split pattern exhaust port.

Garbz
User avatar
Johnny Canuck
Posts: 8291
Joined: April 9, 2006, 11:14 pm
Location: Edmonton, Alberta.
Canada

Post by Johnny Canuck »

Has a new brake booster but drum brakes..
maybe it has ball joints on the rear steer, garbz!

That's what I meant.. how can you take the heads off and not notice they are big valve heads? or the bigger bore? or the external balancer...

Jealous.. I am jealous of so many trucks in our club, that it almost don't stick anymore.
It's a race.. Will hell freeze over or will JC finish his truck first. Stay tuned..
User avatar
ethan_lanning
Posts: 134
Joined: March 5, 2007, 6:31 pm
Location: Saint Joseph missouri

Post by ethan_lanning »

I think the biggest engine that they put in the 65's was a 352.
User avatar
Slick Fan
Posts: 4085
Joined: November 4, 2006, 5:09 pm
Location: UTAH...snow blows!

Post by Slick Fan »

#1) What a beautiful truck!! :shock:
#2) I think this guy's just a flipper & didn't restore the truck, like previously mentioned.
#3) What a beautiful truck!! :shock:

I don't care much for the sky blue color, but I'd gladly put up with the color to own & drive that baby! :D
My "Slickitis" affliction began here...
Image


66 F100 CC/65 F100 CC/66 F250 CC
If it starts to rain, they'll tax the splash.
If you want to fish, they'll tax the bass.
If you plant a yard, they'll tax the grass.
If you don't play nice, they'll fine your *$#!
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Post by Greg D »

Whoops - correct 2nd link here. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ford-F-1 ... dZViewItem I caught some of the stuff mentioned too, the "Whew" referred to the "Buy It Now" price on it.
Last edited by Greg D on April 5, 2007, 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Post by Greg D »

This is on another listing, from the NADA web site ? (read carefully).--------------------------------------------------------------------

The following is copied from the NADA website:

Classic Car Report
Truck, Van, & SUV
1965 Ford F100 1/2 Ton Styleside Shortbed

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Low Retail Value - $5,400
Average Retail Value - $11,650
High Retail Value - $16,700

Options
289 V8 Engine
4 Speed Transmission
TOTAL PRICE - $6,550

LOW RETAIL VALUE
This vehicle would be in mechanically functional condition, needing only minor reconditioning. The exterior paint, trim, and interior would show normal wear, needing only minor reconditioning. May also be a deteriorated restoration or a very poor amateur restoration. Most usable "as-is". When determining a value for a daily driver, it is recommended that the subscriber use the low retail value.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for looking!
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
Garbz

Post by Garbz »

Option????? 289 V8....

Smokin crack.....

Garbz
User avatar
shane amigoni
Posts: 50
Joined: July 23, 2006, 6:43 pm
Location: eureka. Illinois

Post by shane amigoni »

I guess if you bought it and didnt like it you could blow it up with all the the DYNAMITE under the carpet hehehehe, And you probably also need some kinda special license from the ATF to even drive it!! lol
jeepbut
Posts: 652
Joined: April 15, 2006, 8:15 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
United States of America

Post by jeepbut »

Too bad the last one stole the interior from the clown car at the circus! It look's nicely done, I'm just not sure about that pattern and color combonation. Thanks, Lyman.
cdherman
Posts: 1048
Joined: July 17, 2006, 6:36 pm
Location: Parkville MO (KC)

Post by cdherman »

Looks the spare rims and hub caps are wrong as well -- those are innie rims and the later falcon style hub caps fit on outie style (later) rims. Minor point.

Generally, I suspect that that is a decent truck to bid on. God knows, even the buy it now price is less than I have in mine. Course, I was aware that I was wasting money all along, so my final bill should not be used as a guide!

Oh -- the front bumper is too wide -- its not original, but seems likely to be the later bumpside bumpers that are available (its what I have too).

Someone new buy it and drive it to slickstock 08 -- I'll kick in $20 for gas and let you park it in my shed at night for good measure!! Then we can see if its really as nice as it looks......
1965 F-100 240 Autolite 1101, Disk brake dual master upgraded, swapped over to C4 and powersteering. Bought by my Dad new in March 65'

1683

Planned/considered upgrades:
Perhaps power brakes, 300 I6 motor and JUST maybe, AC!
User avatar
lincolnslick
Posts: 59
Joined: March 13, 2007, 2:13 pm
Location: victory mills new york

Post by lincolnslick »

if you look at the oil bath aircleaner it says 352 on it this guy is a flipper and a boob to boot that is way to much coin for that ride

Image
nothing like the smell of tiresmoke in the morning
Image
Image
User avatar
66fordtrucknut
Posts: 1289
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:48 pm
Location: Eastern Shore - MD

Post by 66fordtrucknut »

Clean truck though
62' SWB uni 223
66' F-100 Short/wide 352
78' F-350 dually dumpbed 400
12' F-150 5.0 3:73 LS
jeepbut
Posts: 652
Joined: April 15, 2006, 8:15 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
United States of America

Post by jeepbut »

So, Lincolnslick, is he a boob-flipper or a flipper-boob? I like booth terms. Thanks, Lyman.
BigTim
Posts: 890
Joined: August 6, 2006, 4:26 pm
Location: Slickless

Post by BigTim »

Like someone else said too much money for the truck, but if I ever get mine that nice body and paint wise I will have way more than the current bid into mine. I undoubtably put more than I planned into the motor/transmission, but that was my priority.

I think I saw this same truck listed on e bay a few months ago by a guy in the Carolinas. That seller had it with a 3 speed OD and claimed it was a 428. Still a real nice Slick I would love to own.
Post Reply